Heroku vs Azure: Full Comparison Guide | Code Boost
Description: TL;DR: Heroku is a managed PaaS that gets your app live in minutes — ideal for startups, MVPs, and solo developers. Azure is a full cloud ecosystem (IaaS + PaaS) built for enterpri...

Article

# Heroku vs Azure: Full Comparison Guide

By Matt · Apr 19, 2026

TL;DR: Heroku is a managed PaaS that gets your app live in minutes — ideal for startups, MVPs, and solo developers. Azure is a full cloud ecosystem (IaaS + PaaS) built for enterprises, AI workloads, and complex infrastructure. Heroku is simpler and faster to start; Azure is more powerful and flexible at scale. If cost-efficiency at growth stage matters, Azure often wins on price-per-resource despite its steeper learning curve.

Choosing between Heroku and Microsoft Azure is rarely a coin flip. They serve different builders at different stages. This guide breaks down both platforms across architecture, pricing, scalability, and real-world use cases — so you can make the right call for your project in 2025.

## What Is Heroku?

Heroku is a Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) owned by Salesforce. It abstracts away all infrastructure concerns — servers, networking, OS patching — so developers can deploy apps by pushing to Git. Heroku runs apps in isolated containers called dynos, and provides a large marketplace of add-ons for databases, monitoring, email, and more. Since late 2022, Heroku no longer offers a free tier. Their entry-level options are the Eco plan ($5/month for a shared pool of 1,000 compute hours) and the Basic dyno ($7/month per dyno, always-on). Production-grade Standard and Performance dynos run from $25–$500+/month depending on resources. Best for: Startups, MVPs, solo developers, apps with straightforward backend needs, and teams already integrated with Salesforce CRM.

## What Is Microsoft Azure?

Microsoft Azure is a full-spectrum cloud platform offering over 200 services — from basic web hosting (Azure App Service) to virtual machines, Kubernetes, serverless functions, AI/ML tools, IoT, and global CDN. It operates on a pay-as-you-go model with options for reserved capacity discounts (1-year and 3-year commitments). Azure integrates deeply with Microsoft's enterprise stack: Active Directory, Office 365, .NET, GitHub Actions, and Azure DevOps. It's the dominant choice in enterprise IT environments and regulated industries. Best for: Enterprise applications, data science and AI workloads, Microsoft-centric organizations, systems requiring hybrid cloud or complex compliance requirements.

## Heroku vs Azure: Head-to-Head Comparison

Feature | Heroku | Azure
--- | --- | ---
Platform Type | PaaS (managed containers) | Full IaaS + PaaS + serverless ecosystem
Ease of Use | Very beginner-friendly | Steeper learning curve; powerful once learned
Deployment | Git push deploys, Heroku CLI | GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps, CI/CD pipelines
Language Support | Node.js, Python, Ruby, Java, PHP, Go, Scala | Nearly all modern languages
Scaling | Vertical (dyno size) + horizontal (dyno count) | True horizontal + vertical + auto-scaling across regions
Add-ons / Services | Elements Marketplace (third-party add-ons) | 200+ native services (AI, ML, IoT, databases, VMs)
Pricing Model | Per-dyno consumption; simple but can escalate | Pay-as-you-go + reserved capacity discounts
Free Tier | None (discontinued Nov 2022) | Azure App Service free tier (60 min/day compute)
AI / ML | Heroku Managed Inference (add-on, newer) | Azure AI, Cognitive Services, Azure OpenAI — all native
Microsoft Integration | Salesforce-native; limited Microsoft integration | Deep: Active Directory, Office 365, .NET, GitHub
Compliance & Security | SOC 2, HIPAA (Shield dynos); solid for most apps | Extensive: HIPAA, FedRAMP, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and more
Best For | Startups, MVPs, Salesforce-connected apps | Enterprises, AI apps, hybrid cloud, regulated industries

## Pricing Breakdown (2025)

Service | Heroku | Azure
--- | --- | ---
Entry-Level Hosting | Eco: $5/mo (1,000 shared hrs); Basic: $7/mo per dyno | App Service Free tier; B1 plan ~$13/mo
Production Web Hosting | Standard-1X: $25/mo per dyno | P1v3 (~$130/mo) or Standard S1 (~$70/mo)
Managed PostgreSQL | Essential-0: $5/mo; Standard plans: $50–$200+/mo | Azure Database for PostgreSQL Flexible: ~$15+/mo
Scaling to Production | $100–$500+/mo for multiple Standard/Performance dynos | $75–$300+/mo depending on resource config
AI / ML Tools | Heroku Managed Inference (add-on; token-based pricing) | Azure OpenAI, Cognitive Services (pay-per-use)
Reserved Discounts | Not available (direct plans) | 1-year or 3-year reservations (up to ~40% savings)
SSL + Custom Domains | Included on paid plans | Included with App Service

Pricing verdict: Heroku is easier to predict at small scale. Azure gets more cost-efficient as you grow — especially if you commit to reserved instances. A mid-scale production app running multiple services will typically cost less on Azure than Heroku at equivalent specs, but Azure requires more configuration to get there.

## Scalability: How Each Platform Handles Growth

Heroku scales by adding more dynos (horizontal) or upgrading to larger dyno types (vertical). This works well for predictable traffic, but Heroku's scaling is tied to its dyno model, which becomes expensive at high volume. There's no true auto-scaling based on CPU/memory thresholds without third-party add-ons or custom configuration. Azure offers a much richer scaling story: auto-scaling rules based on CPU, memory, request count, or schedules; multi-region deployments via Azure Traffic Manager; and Kubernetes-based workloads through Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS). For globally distributed or highly variable workloads, Azure is the stronger platform.

## Developer Experience

Heroku's developer experience has long been its biggest selling point. `git push heroku main` is genuinely that simple for most use cases. The Heroku CLI is well-documented, and the add-on marketplace makes provisioning a Postgres database or Redis cache a one-command operation. Azure's experience is more involved. The Azure Portal is powerful but dense. Setting up a web app, attaching a database, and configuring a CI/CD pipeline takes more steps. That said, once you're past the initial setup, Azure's tooling is excellent — particularly for teams already using VS Code, GitHub Actions, or Azure DevOps. For teams deploying MERN stack apps, Heroku remains one of the fastest paths to production — see our guide on how to deploy a MERN app to Heroku for a practical walkthrough.

## Heroku vs Azure: Pros & Cons

### Heroku Pros

- Fastest path from code to deployed app
- Minimal infrastructure knowledge required
- Excellent add-on ecosystem (databases, monitoring, email, search)
- Native Salesforce integration
- Now includes Heroku Managed Inference for AI use cases

### Heroku Cons

- No free tier since November 2022
- Gets expensive quickly at production scale
- Limited infrastructure control compared to IaaS providers
- Not ideal for enterprise compliance-heavy workloads (without Shield dynos)
- Smaller global footprint than Azure

### Azure Pros

- 200+ native services covering virtually every infrastructure need
- Deep Microsoft ecosystem integration (AAD, Office 365, .NET, GitHub)
- Excellent AI/ML tooling including Azure OpenAI Service
- Reserved instance pricing for significant long-term savings
- Extensive compliance certifications for regulated industries
- Global infrastructure across 60+ regions

### Azure Cons

- Steep learning curve for beginners
- More setup and configuration required vs. PaaS platforms
- Pricing can be complex and unpredictable without careful monitoring
- Overkill for simple apps or solo developers

## Who Should Use Heroku?

- You're building a prototype or MVP and need it live fast
- You're a solo developer or small team without DevOps resources
- Your app relies on the Salesforce ecosystem
- You want managed infrastructure without learning cloud fundamentals
- Your traffic is predictable and app complexity is low-to-moderate

## Who Should Use Azure?

- You're building enterprise-grade or mission-critical applications
- Your organization already uses Microsoft products (Office 365, Active Directory)
- You need AI/ML capabilities, big data processing, or IoT integration
- You require compliance certifications like HIPAA, FedRAMP, or PCI DSS
- You're planning global scale with multi-region deployments

## Heroku vs Azure: Which Is Cheaper?

It depends on scale. At small scale (1–2 dynos, one database), Heroku is comparable or slightly cheaper than Azure's entry-level App Service plans. As you scale up — more concurrent services, higher traffic, multiple environments — Azure's pay-as-you-go model and reserved pricing typically result in lower costs per unit of compute. Where Heroku costs genuinely run away: running multiple Standard dynos ($25/each) for web, worker, and clock processes, plus production-grade Postgres add-ons ($50–$200/mo), can push a moderately complex app to $300–$500/month without much traffic. Azure can often deliver equivalent infrastructure for less, if you're willing to configure it.

## Migration: Heroku to Azure (or Vice Versa)

Moving from Heroku to Azure typically involves containerizing your app (Heroku dynos are containers under the hood, making Docker packaging straightforward), migrating your Postgres database to Azure Database for PostgreSQL, and setting up CI/CD pipelines in GitHub Actions or Azure DevOps. Heroku-specific add-ons (like SendGrid, Papertrail, etc.) have direct equivalents in Azure's marketplace or as standalone services. Moving from Azure to Heroku is less common but makes sense if you're simplifying a complex setup — for example, a team that inherited enterprise Azure infrastructure but only needs a straightforward web app and database. For teams considering simpler PaaS alternatives to Heroku, it's also worth comparing Render vs Heroku and Netlify vs Heroku — both offer modern alternatives with competitive pricing. If you're comparing cloud platforms more broadly, our DigitalOcean vs AWS guide covers the IaaS landscape well.

## How We Evaluated These Platforms

This comparison is based on official pricing documentation from Heroku (devcenter.heroku.com and salesforce.com/heroku/pricing) and Microsoft Azure (azure.microsoft.com/pricing), cross-referenced with developer community feedback and real-world deployment scenarios. Pricing was verified in April 2025 and reflects publicly listed rates — enterprise contracts and negotiated pricing may vary.

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Is Heroku cheaper than Azure?

At small scale, they're comparable. At production scale with multiple services, Azure is typically more cost-efficient — especially with reserved instance pricing. Heroku's simplicity comes at a per-resource premium.

### Which is easier to use — Heroku or Azure?

Heroku is significantly easier for beginners. A working app can be deployed in under 10 minutes with no infrastructure knowledge. Azure requires more setup but rewards that investment with much greater flexibility and power.

### Does Heroku still have a free tier in 2025?

No. Heroku discontinued its free tier in November 2022. The lowest-cost option is now the Eco Dynos plan at $5/month (1,000 shared compute hours) or Basic dynos at $7/month per dyno.

### Can I run AI workloads on Heroku?

Yes — Heroku now offers Managed Inference and Agents as an add-on, giving access to LLMs, embedding models, and image generation within Heroku's managed environment. That said, Azure's AI ecosystem (Azure OpenAI, Cognitive Services, Azure ML) is significantly more mature and comprehensive.

### Can I scale apps on both platforms?

Yes, but differently. Heroku scales by adding dynos or upgrading dyno size — straightforward but costly at high volume. Azure supports true auto-scaling across multiple dimensions (CPU, memory, request count) and multi-region deployments, making it better suited for unpredictable or global traffic.

### Is Azure good for startups?

Azure can work for startups, and Microsoft offers credits through programs like Microsoft for Startups. However, most early-stage teams find Heroku, Render, or DigitalOcean faster to ship on. Azure makes more sense as complexity and compliance requirements grow.

## Final Verdict: Heroku or Azure in 2025?

There's no universal winner — the right choice depends on where you are in your build. Choose Heroku if: you need to ship fast, want zero infrastructure overhead, and your app complexity is low-to-moderate. It's one of the best developer experiences in PaaS, especially for Node.js, Python, and Ruby apps. The trade-off is cost at scale and limited infrastructure control. Choose Azure if: you're building enterprise software, need AI/ML services, require compliance certifications, or are already inside the Microsoft ecosystem. The learning curve is real, but the ceiling is effectively unlimited — and the long-term economics are more favorable at scale. Not sure Azure is the right cloud platform for you? See how it stacks up against other providers: DigitalOcean vs AWS and DigitalOcean vs Linode offer solid starting points for comparing cloud infrastructure options.

Related Comparisons: Netlify vs Heroku Render vs Heroku Heroku vs DigitalOcean Heroku vs AWS